Clairintuition - The Gift Of Psychic Premonition
Updated: Oct 14
Clairintuition, or psychic intuition, is the transpersonal psychic perception of intuitive impressions known as hunches, forebodings, warnings, or presages concerning people, situations, or events beyond one’s immediate personal circumstances, needs, or lived experience. These impressions may concern the past, present, or future, with future-oriented clairintuitive impressions experienced as premonitions. It is a purely intuitive form of psychic impression that does not have the cognitive, affective (emotional), or sensory-type features of the other psychic perception preferences or "clairs."
A clairintuitive impression may relate to something that has already happened, something currently unfolding, or something yet to occur. When it concerns a future event or outcome, it is typically experienced as a premonition, presage, forewarning, or foreboding.
Unlike innate survival instinct, ordinary psychological intuition and spiritual inner guidance, which all relate to our own physical safety and well-being, personal needs, life experiences and choices, and everyday circumstances, clairintuitive impressions are mental-metaphysical awareness experiences of nonlocal, nonsensory, and nonphysical information concerning the past, present, or future of other people and the wider world.
Origins Of The Term "Clairintuition"
I first introduced the term "clairintuition" to the general public in my book The Sensible Psychic (2022) to distinguish this specifically psychic form of intuitive awareness from ordinary personal intuition and from other psychic perception preferences or "clair senses."
I first introduced the term "clairintuition" in my book The Sensible Psychic (2022) in an attempt to separate “the psychic substance from the intuitive fluff.”
I created the term to distinguish intuitive-type psychic perceptions from everyday personal intuition or spiritual inner guidance, as well as from the other types of psychic perceptions or "clairs" such as claircognitive knowing, clairempathic feeling, and clairsomatic sensation.
I had already been using the term clairintuition for many years as a way to reconcile my own experiences as a hereditary psychic medium with three troubling mainstream notions about intuition and authentic psychic perception:
The confusion created by the rebranding of psychics as “intuitives.”
The ill-conceived catch-all psychic concept known as “clairsentience.”
The popular marketing claim that “everyone is psychic because everyone has intuition.”
After decades of struggling with vague, contradictory, and recycled psychic terminology, I developed a new conceptual model of psychic perception that more accurately reflects both my own lived experience as a psychic medium and what I have observed in other practitioners and students over the years.
Clear language matters because when intuition and psychic perception are treated as interchangeable concepts, gifted people can spend years misunderstanding the very abilities they are trying to develop, while mainstream society will continue to question our credibility.
Maybe it is time to say the quiet part out loud and take back our true identity. We are psychic. Not just intuitive.
Psychic. Not intuitive. Deal with it.
The rebranding of psychics as “intuitives” that began in the 1980s may have been well-intended as a way for professional psychics and mediums to distance themselves from the negative “psychic” stereotypes portrayed in mainstream media. Sadly, however, it did not make psychic practitioners or their work any more credible.
Quite the opposite. It further blurred public understanding of authentic psychic perception and created even more confusion about what psychics actually experience. Today, many professional psychics and mediums, including myself, are trapped in a proverbial no-man’s land between the terms psychic and intuitive.
You see this confusion everywhere online: services advertised as “intuitive psychic readings,” courses promising to develop your “intuition and psychic abilities,” and social groups for “psychics and intuitives.”
At some point someone has to ask: which is it exactly? Psychic ability or intuition?
The terms are not synonymous. A vivid clairvoyant vision or distinct clairaudient voice is in my experience much more than a mere “intuition.”
Why does it matter? Because representation matters. Clarity matters. Keeping it real matters. As social researcher Brené Brown observes, language is fundamental to meaning-making and self-awareness: “When we don’t have the language to talk about what we’re experiencing, our ability to make sense of what’s happening and share it with others is severely limited.” [20]
In my experience, genuinely gifted people too often dismiss their innate psychic potential because of this kind of pop-culture gaslighting. have worked with psychic seekers and students who have struggled for years to master their unique psychic perception process because they fundamentally misunderstand the basics of psychic ability, perception, and channeling or reading.
Newly awakened psychics and mediums can spend years trying to understand their true psychic ability because their development efforts are constantly redirected by myths, misconceptions, recycled folklore, and online fluff. It is impossible to learn to speak and write poetry fluently in a sophisticated language if everyone around you who claims to speak it is actually talking gobbledygook and gibberish.
Maybe it is time to say the quiet part out loud and take back our true identity. We are psychic. Not just intuitive.
There are no separate psychic “senses” or “reception” pathways, because psychics and mediums do not “sense” or “receive.” We perceive.
Clairintuition: More Than A Clairsentience Spin-Off
The second reason I coined the term clairintuition was the generic psychic ability known as clairsentience, which traditionally includes a mismatched and vague assortment of empathic emotions and mood states, physical sensations and medical symptoms, various forms of intuition, and in some definitions even cognition.
I struggled to make sense of this odd buffet of “sub-clairs” for many years because, in my experience, psychic impressions typically labelled as "clairsentient" do not fit neatly into one box as a single “clair sense” or psychic ability. Instead, clairsentience is actually an umbrella concept used for three very distinct types of psychic impression:
Clairintuition: premonition, presage, foreboding
Clairsomatica: somatosensory, sensation, foresensing (also coined by me in The Sensible Psychic in 2022)
Clairempathy: affective, emotional, feeling, presentiment (coined by Isaac Bonewits in Real Magic in 1989)
My purpose in separating clairsentience into three distinct types of psychic perception was not to invent new terminology for its own sake, but to provide clearer, more representative, and more empowering language for the lived experiences of authentic psychics and mediums that have historically been grouped together under vague or inconsistent pop-culture labels.
In my conceptual model of psychic perception, I also reframe the traditional “clairs” or “psychic senses” as psychic perception preferences rather than separate psychic “senses” or “reception” pathways. Because psychics and mediums do not “sense” or “receive.” We perceive.
The 'Everyone Is Psychic' Marketing Ploy
The third reason I created the term clairintuition is the popular claim in psychic pop culture that "everyone is psychic because everyone has intuition."
I have personally never seen any evidence to support this claim. It does not resonate with my own lived experience as a hereditary psychic medium, nor have I witnessed this in my work with psychic development students and other authentic practitioners. In fact, what I have seen again and again is that some people quite simply have a far greater innate capacity for psychic perception than others, just as not everyone has the same natural aptitude for music, art, athletics, or mathematics.
The "everyone is psychic" myth is, in my view, little more than a convenient marketing message to sell more courses, workshops, books, and training programs that promise almost anyone can become a proficient psychic practitioner.
And it works because, like many persuasive beliefs, it is based on a half-truth. Yes, everyone is indeed intuitive. We all experience some form of inner guidance, instinctive knowing, or subconscious pattern recognition. Some of us acknowledge it, some of us don't. Either way, it does not automatically follow that everyone is therefore also psychic.
The key distinction is the transpersonal nature of intuitive psychic perception. Ordinary intuition is personal and self-referential, guiding our own choices, decisions, safety, survival instincts and spirituality. But clairintuition is transpersonal. It is the intuitive awareness of nonlocal, nonsensory, and nonphysical information concerning other people, events, situations, or outcomes beyond your immediate personal experience.
Turning a subtle self-referential human awareness faculty into evidence of a universal transpersonal psychic calling that applies to everyone is an injustice to those of us who are truly called and would like the world to take us a little more seriously.
So, What Is Intuition Really?
The term intuition derives from Latin intueri meaning ‘to look at, consider,’ and intuicioun meaning ‘insight, direct or immediate cognition, spiritual perception.’
The mainstream notion of ‘intuition’ is however rife with myth, misconception, and even controversy. This muddle is in part due to different fields using the term to represent different things. “Given this range of uses, nothing can be said about intuition in general,” remarks philosopher Richard Rorty.[1]
For example, psychologists define intuition as unconscious thought, [2] or ‘unconscious pattern-matching cognition’ [3], while in spirituality and metaphysics intuition is customarily regarded as an innate spiritual knowledge. It is in fact described by mystics and spiritualists of many traditions throughout the ages [4], while occultists, esoteric scholars and metaphysicians conceive of it as the true ‘sixth sense.’
The phenomenon of 'intuition' or authentic psychic foreboding is generally misconceived by science and misconstrued in popular culture.
This distinction matters because psychic perception has increasingly been reduced in popular spiritual culture to little more than “heightened intuition.” I disagree. Intuition is certainly one way psychic information may be consciously experienced, but it is only one preference among several. Psychic awareness can also manifest as knowing, emotion, bodily sensation, imagery, sound, smell, or taste.
Dictionary definitions of intuition range from it being ‘direct access to unconscious knowledge,’ or ‘inner sensing and insight,’ to ‘unconscious cognition,’ or ‘the ability to understand something instinctively, without any need for conscious reasoning.’
For both the practicing and developing psychic or medium it is vital to understand the true nature and role of intuition in the context of authentic psychic perception, beyond these misconstrued popular notions.
Everyone experiences ordinary intuition in three innate ways:
Instinctive intuition (survival instinct): The biologically wired awareness that alerts us to danger in our immediate environment and helps protect our safety and well-being. It is a form of sentience rooted in the nervous system that we share with animals. Operating rapidly below conscious thought, it typically produces bodily signals such as unease, gut feelings, a sudden prickle of alarm, or an urge to flee before we consciously understand why.
Psychological intuition (experiential or pattern-based intuition): The mind’s innate ability to draw on stored experience, knowledge, and pattern recognition to reach conclusions without logical thinking or deliberate reasoning. It is the subconscious information-processing capacity that enables a seasoned nurse, chess player, airline pilot, or parent to “just know” when something is wrong or what to do next in a challenging situation.
Spiritual intuition (inner guidance): The inner voice, inner knowing, or innate spiritual awareness we experience as a connection to our higher self, soul, a higher power, or source of divine wisdom or universal consciousness. It is a sense of inner truth or divine inspiration that guides our values, purpose, and major life decisions. From a spiritual perspective, it represents the ongoing communication between our physical self and the larger, nonphysical aspect of our being that knows our soul plan, life purpose, and what is in our best interest.
All three of these forms of intuitive awareness are personal and self-referential. They concern our own lives, safety, relationships, choices, or spirituality.
People with psychic ability, however, experience another form of intuition that I call clairintuition. Why the distinction? Because psychic intuition has two unmistakable characteristics that set it apart: it is metaphysical and transpersonal.
Clairintuition is metaphysical because it does not arise from anything in the perceiver’s immediate environment (nonlocal), it is not of physical origin, such as an adrenaline response or hearing an unusual sound (nonphysical), and it is not perceived through the five physical senses (nonsensory).
Clairintuition is transpersonal because, unlike other forms of intuitive awareness, it concerns someone or something beyond the perceiver’s immediate personal needs, circumstances, or life experience.
A psychic or medium may, for example, experience a premonition concerning another person or an event that is going to occur, or a foreboding about circumstances in another time or place that do not directly involve them.
The difference is not that ordinary people never experience premonitions or precognitive impressions. They do. The distinction lies in the transpersonal and recurring nature of this kind of intuitive perception in people who have the innate capacity for psychic channeling or “reading.”
Instinct, Intuition, And The Inner Voice
Primitive man relied heavily on his everyday intuition. He thought in images and symbols, listened to his ‘inner voice,’ and followed his ‘gut.’ Early man fluently spoke the language of the soul, the metaphysical dialect of his spiritual origins.
Intuition is the ‘native tongue’ of the mind-soul. It transcends the everyday time-space reality and the physical senses. We are all born with this innate ‘soul language,’ because we are spirit beings in human form. Orthodox science however typically argues that intuition is merely an ‘evolutionary intelligence’ that developed from our primitive, animalistic survival impulses and instincts.
Statements like ‘rely on your instinct’ and ‘trust your gut’ are therefore often used interchangeably. It is typically assumed that instinct and intuition are the same thing, but this notion is based purely on a physical, ‘mind-brain’ view of consciousness and does not accurately reflect everyday intuitive experiences.
Psychologist Marcie Boucouvalas writes “the intuitive realm has been functional since the dawn of humanity” and “we are all still pioneers and pilgrims on the pathway of better understanding human consciousness.” She believes it essential to transcend the traditional ‘either, or’ way of thinking about rational and intuitive modes of knowing. She adds however that “even if one accepts the validity of intuition, questions beckon.” Is the source of knowledge outside of and beyond the senses, located in a capacity of the human species that we do not yet fully understand? Or does it originate in the senses at a less than conscious level of awareness? [5]
Neuropsychiatrist George Dearborn finds intuition is indeed “outside the range of physiology and neurology and is an unconscious process of the mind.” [6]
Psychologist Mike Arons says the ‘problematic status’ of intuition is “somewhere between the instincts and the gods,” and the scientific ‘muddle’ around it is due to “skeptical rationalism which is a reactive pole to blind faith.” This has caused the notion of intuition to be either discounted or dismissed. He proposes instead that intuition is supraconscious and its study should thus include spiritual and transpersonal considerations, instead of only pure rationalism.” [7]
The human body speaks in urges, impulses, and physical needs, while the soul speaks in premonitions, forebodings, hunches, and gut feelings.
As spiritual beings we indeed have physical bodies with certain natural drives and impulses, like the ‘fight or flight’ response when we sense danger, or primal urges to seek out pleasure and avoid pain. These primal instincts have not evolved or changed much since prehistoric times. Despite our many modern advances and sophistication, we remain subject to our primitive instincts. [8]
However, as you know from your own intuitive experiences (such as knowing who is calling you before the phone rings, or thinking of long-lost friends and later bumping into them) we cannot attribute all of our gut feelings, hunches, premonitions, and forebodings to mere ‘instinct,’ or a simplistic urge for ‘physical survival.’
In my experience instinct is the subconscious language of the mind-body, while intuition is the subliminal language of the mind-soul. The human body speaks in urges, impulses, and physical needs, while the soul speaks in premonitions, forebodings, hunches, and gut feelings.
Intuition is an omniscient, archetypal, transcendental wisdom. It is the core dialect of our inner divinity, our spiritual origins, the eternal soul. We cannot fully access the sagacious, omniscient wisdom of the higher self, or divine self, or spirit through pure human intellect, logic, reason, and analytical thought alone. Instead, we need the ‘soul language’ of our metaphysical ‘inner guidance system.’
Intuition is an aspect of our spiritual essence; an awareness arising from our metaphysical resonance with the universal consciousness or the akashic field. We all experience this mind-soul resonance daily, in the form premonitions, forebodings, hunches, gut feelings, and so on. It is a soul language we are all born with, and it can be further fostered through various spiritual practices, such as meditation, dreamwork, and divination.
Ralph Waldo Emerson says, “belief consists in accepting the affirmations of the soul; unbelief, in denying them.” In the book Edgar Cayce on Religion and Psychic Experience, author Harmon Hartzell Bro writes that Cayce recommended that should we seek psychic experiences in our daily life, it should ideally be in the context of spiritual growth, learning about ourselves, or helping others. [9]
Of course, as human beings, psychics and mediums also speak the everyday ‘soul language’ of intuition. However, when we channel or read, the intuitive impressions we perceive are not merely ‘inner guidance’ impressions, but instead clairintuitions.
Clairintuitive psychic perceptions are not personal spiritual insights or private affirmations, but instead transpersonal and universal insights and affirmations, essentially resulting from an enhanced mind-soul dialect we are ‘wired’ to speak.
Clairintuition is an expanded lexicon beyond the everyday language of the soul. It is a supernatural perception aptitude or gift, and not merely a form of ‘developed’ inner guidance.
Why Psychic Ability Is More Than Mere Intuition
It has become the trend in recent years for some psychic practitioners to refer to themselves as ‘sensitives’ or ‘intuitives,’ instead of using the term psychic. This is mainly a consequence of the negative connotations often associated with the word ‘psychic,’ especially in the mainstream media.
For example, reporter Lisa Held writes, “while psychics have traditionally profited from claiming to predict the future or communicating with deceased relatives, many are now working in the general field of wellness, calling themselves ‘intuitives’ or ‘intuitive healers,’ who channel ‘energy’ that helps people discover what they want out of life.”[10]
Intuitive counselor Susan King confirms, “I call myself an intuitive because I think it takes away any barriers and removes potential erroneous stereotyping.” [11]
Journalist Sara Coughlin notes “as mystical as the professional title ‘intuitive’ might sound, the [intuitives] we spoke with described their abilities in highly sensible, practical terms. Intuition is like a muscle — you need to train it and use it regularly to maintain its strength. Intuition is best utilized if channeled through a more tangible medium, like numerology or tarot. And, most resoundingly, they also made it clear that everyone, spiritual or not, does have a sense of intuition that they can hone beyond that gut feeling. It's just up to the individual whether they choose to do so or not."[12]
Psychic ability is an expanded capacity for supernatural perception that transcends the personal sphere of everyday intuition. Clairintuition is not merely a ‘honed gut feeling.’
Although it is indeed true that as spirit beings we all have a built-in capacity for intuition, authentic psychic channeling or reading is in my experience certainly not merely a form of ‘honed intuition.’ Everyone does experience precognition, presentiment, and premonition, because it serves to guide us on a daily basis as metaphysical beings on a spiritual mission — whether we are conscious of it, or not. However, this kind of everyday intuition is personal, private, and individual, and mostly focused on one’s own needs, as well as the welfare of your loved ones.
In her best-selling book Anatomy of the Spirit: The Seven Stages of Power and Healing medical intuitive Carolyn Myss agrees, “intuition is neither the ability to engage prophesy nor a means of avoiding financial loss or painful relationships. It is the ability to use energy data to make decisions in the immediate moment.”
Patent psychic ability or the expanded capacity for supernatural perception transcends the personal sphere of everyday intuition.
Clairintuition is not merely a ‘honed gut feeling.’ In fact, many people often fail to recognize their gut feelings and tend to disregard their hunches — only to later realize its validity, or discover its true meaning (sometimes with disastrous, even tragic consequences).
Psychics and mediums however perceive profound transpersonal impressions of clairintuition, mostly on behalf of others. Ironically, we tend to be better at channeling these perceptions for others, instead of for our own benefit!
Intuition is an aspect of the inner guidance system or our ‘spiritual GPS,’ while psychic perception is transpersonal, prophetic, omniscient, and numinous. Clairintuitive perception is not merely developed inner guidance or ‘honed intuition.’ It is metaphysical gift of prophetic intuition on ‘supernatural steroids.’
The Difference Between Precognition And Premonition
Researchers generally do not apply distinct, separate terms for various forms of predictive psychic perception, as parapsychology traditionally does not distinguish between different forms of prophetic psi. Instead, the term precognition is generally used as an umbrella term to represent all forms of foreknowing (claircognizance), foreseeing (clairvoyance), forefeeling (clairempathy), foresensing (clairsomatica), and foreboding or forewarning (clairintuition).
However, psychics and mediums know from direct experience that using such a broad term for all these nuanced prophetic phenomena is an underestimation and a gross misrepresentation of predictive psychic perception.
It is not as if new terms must be invented for these concepts, because appropriate, distinguishing terms for these predictive phenomena already exist in the dictionary! Classic terms like prescience, presentiment, premonition, and presage have been around for centuries, yet one is unlikely to find them in modern scientific papers, much less in psychic blogs and social media posts.
Prescience: foreknowledge, advance insight, anticipation of the course of future events, divine omniscience.
Presentiment: to feel beforehand, a foreboding, an intuitive feeling about the future, a feeling that something will happen, a feeling that misfortune or calamity is coming.
Premonition: forewarning, advance warning, prior notice, a strong feeling that something is going to happen
Presage: something that foreshadows or portends a future event, a foretoken, a prophetic foreboding, an intuition or feeling of what is going to happen in the future, something sensed beforehand.
With the advent of a Newtonian worldview and mechanistic, reductive science, these long-standing, time-honored terms have regrettably become outmoded archaisms. Our ancestors conceived these linguistic concepts to communicate their everyday mystical experiences. Yet, you will not find these terms, for example, in the American Psychological Association’s (APA) online dictionary. [14] The only related terms I found listed are precognition, retrocognition and premonitory dream.
It is in fact peculiar that in both psychology and psi research the concept of ‘premonition’ is mostly only found in the context of dream phenomena, as demonstrated by the aforementioned example. Science apparently accepts the possibility that premonitions may occur in dreams, and even in altered states of consciousness, but when a premonition or presentiment occurs in the realm of waking awareness, it can only be a conscious or unconscious ‘precognition.’
True psychic perception is so much more than mere ‘mind-brain’ cognition. In fact, the APA essentially agrees, as it states that cognition is only one of the three traditionally identified components of ‘mind,’ along with affect (feeling) and conation (motivation). Yet, when it comes to predictive psychic phenomena, only one of these three ‘components of mind,’ receives attention and recognition in parapsychology? To my knowledge the APA currently offers no ‘affective,’ nor ‘conative’ terminology for what it calls ‘the purported ability to see or experience future events through some form of extrasensory perception.’[15]
I suspect the concept of precognition has been adopted as the preferred scholarly term because it is more empirically convenient and academically conceivable.
The reductive notion of focusing on psi ‘cognition’ only, and the absence of clear terminological distinctions that reflect the fundamental differences between various clairsapient and clairsentient psychic perceptions, is in my view another result of the ‘arranged marriage’ between parapsychology and orthodox science.
A recent neuroscience study proposes, for example, that all emotions are merely ‘cognitive states resulting from the gathering of information.’ Conscious experiences, regardless of their content, arise from one system in the brain. Specifically, the differences between emotional and non-emotional states are the kinds of inputs that are processed by a general cortical network of cognition, a network essential for conscious experiences.[16]
But philosophers, spiritualists, metaphysicians, occultists, and mystics, including psychics and mediums, have through the ages always known we are not merely ‘computerized robots,’ or ‘information-processing machines.’ Instead, we are inspired, directed, guided, and protected every day by our feelings and intuitions — by ineffable, subjective, and mostly non-cognitive presentiments, premonitions, forebodings, forewarnings, hunches, and gut feelings. Yet, conventional science reduces these prophetic ‘qualia’ — that sometimes save lives and prevent disasters and tragedies — to one simplistic umbrella concept of ‘precognition’ and ‘anomalous cognition.’
On February 26, 1993, financial executive Barrett Naylor had a premonition, while stepping off a train in New York's Grand Central Station. He felt he should immediately turn around and go home. He followed this gut feeling, which probably saved his life, as later that day a bomb detonated below the World Trade Center, where his office was located. Amazingly, Naylor experienced a similar foreboding eight years later, on the morning of September 11, 2001. Once again, it saved his life. Later he confessed that he felt guilt and regret for not sharing his premonition with others, as he believes it might have helped to save more lives before the attack on the World Trade Center.[17]
On the evening of Wednesday, March 1, 1950, a Nebraska church exploded five minutes after the weekly choir practice was supposed to start. Miraculously no one was injured, as the church building was inexplicably empty that evening. All the choir members were ‘coincidentally’ and unusually late for the weekly rehearsal.[18] Although some choir members had mundane reasons for being tardy, including car trouble and overnapping, others had no specific reason to explain why they were late that night.[19]
Did the choir members all have a foreboding premonition? If so, it was a shared intuition that was either subconscious or unconscious, but certainly not something of which they were ‘cognitively’ aware. Yet, parapsychology calls it ‘precognition.’
I suspect the concept of precognition has been adopted as the preferred scholarly term because it is a more empirically convenient and academically conceivable concept, while ineffable, old-world notions like presage, presentiment and premonition are inconvenient carriers of esoteric, supernatural, numinous, or mystical connotations. But using terms like these to differentiate between sapient and sentient psychic impressions is necessary in developing a universal psychic vocabulary, as it more accurately reflects and represents our true psychic experiences.
For example, not all psychics and mediums have a claircognitive psychic preference for ‘foreknowing.’ They might not necessarily ‘know’ or ‘understand’ something beforehand, but they do ‘feel’ or ‘sense’ it, or even ‘see, hear, taste, or smell’ it. Psychic mind-soul perception is much more than mere ‘mind-brain cognition.’
To clarify the intuition 'muddle' it is therefore necessary for the concept of clairintuition to be clearly differentiated from other types of prophetic or predictive psychic impressions. For a more accurate new conceptual model of psychic perception, I therefore propose the following terms to distinguish distinct types of prophetic or predictive psychic impressions, according to the relevant ‘clair’ preference:
Premonition: clairintuitive foreboding
Precognition: claircognitive,prescient foreknowing
Presentiment: clairempathic, affective forefeeling
Prognosis: clairsomatic, somatosensory foresensing
Presage: clairsensory apprehensions of foreseeing, forehearing, foresmelling; foretasting; foretouching
© 2022 Anthon St. Maarten
REFERENCES
[1] Rorty, R. (2021). Intuition. Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Encyclopedia.com.
[2] Sinclair, M. (2011). Intuition And Unconscious Thought. Handbook Of Intuition Research. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd
[3] Rosenblatt A.D. & Thickstun, J.T. (1994). Intuition And Consciousness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly.
[4] Intuition. (2018). New World Encyclopedia. NewWorldEncyclopedia.org.
[5] Davis-Floyd, R & Arvidson, P.S. (2016). Intuition: The Inside Story: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Routledge.
[6] Dearborn, G. V. N. (1916). Intuition. Psychological Review.
[7] Arons, M. (1993). Instinct, Intuition And Supraconscious: De-Alienating Reflections. The Humanistic Psychologist.
[8] Nicholson, N. (1998). How Hardwired Is Human Behavior? Harvard Business Review.
[9] Harmon, H. (1970). Edgar Cayce On Religion And Psychic Experience. Paperback Library.
[10] Held, L. (2019). Psychic Mediums Are The New Wellness Coaches. The New York Times. Nytimes.com
[11] Garfinkel, P. (2015). Don’t Call Her A Psychic: ‘Intuitive Counselor’ Susan King Sets Up Shop At Hotel Bel-Air. Los Angeles Times.
[12] Coughlin, S. (2018). We Asked 5 Spiritual Workers To Define ‘Intuition’ - Here's What They Said. Refinery29.com
[13] Myss, C. (1996) Anatomy of the Spirit: The Seven Stages of Power and Healing. Harmony.
[14] APA Dictionary Of Psychology. (2021) American Psychological Association. Dictionary.apa.org
[15] Precognition. (2021). APA Dictionary Of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Dictionary.apa.org
16] New York University. (2017) Emotions Are Cognitive, Not Innate, Researchers Conclude. ScienceDaily.
[17] Naylor, B. 20/20: The Sixth Sense: ‘Seeing The Future’. Oct 26, 2012. ABC News.
[18] Nichols, L. (2010). Remember The Miracle: Church Explosion 60 Years Ago Not Forgotten. Beatrice Daily Sun.
[19] Edeal, G. (1950). Why the Choir Was Late. Life Magazine.
[20] Brown, B. (2021). Atlas of the Heart: Mapping Meaningful Connection and the Language of Human Experience.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Anthon St. Maarten is a psychic medium and destiny coach with a global clientele of thought leaders, business executives, celebrities, politicians, academics, and luminaries in the arts and sciences in more than thirty countries spanning five continents.
